All Hail Peter van Buren! Security and the State Department go together like hamburgers and mud.
the most lovely, literary, cinematic portrait of an insider's view of State Department Ludditism . . . .
state department insider
writes about . . .
this has been my realization: that there are so many many people in the US GVT who want to do the right thing and support human rights . . .
but they are hiding behind some 1997 version of the internet . . . well . . .
peter van buren's
"my wacky year-long State Department assignment to a forward military base in Iraq"
and 23 years with State produced this:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0805094369/ref=nosim/?tag=tomdispatch-20
state department insider
writes about . . .
this has been my realization: that there are so many many people in the US GVT who want to do the right thing and support human rights . . .
but they are hiding behind some 1997 version of the internet . . . well . . .
peter van buren's
"my wacky year-long State Department assignment to a forward military base in Iraq"
and 23 years with State produced this:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0805094369/ref=nosim/?tag=tomdispatch-20
We Meant Well: How I Helped Lose the Battle for the Hearts and Minds of the Iraqi People
http://www.thenation.com/article/163655/state-department-employees-freedom-isnt-free
Security at State: Hamburgers and Mud
Security and the State Department go together like hamburgers and mud. Over the years, State has leaked like an old boot. One of its most hilarious security breaches took place when an unknown person walked into the Secretary of State’s outer office and grabbed a pile of classified documents. From the vast trove of missing classified laptops to bugging devices found in its secure conference rooms, from high ranking officials trading secrets in Vienna to top diplomats dallying with spies in Taiwan, even the publicly available list is long and ugly.
Then again, history shows that technical security is just not State’s game, which means the Wikileaks uproar is less of a surprise in context. For example,in 2006, news reports indicated that State’s computer systems were massively hacked by Chinese computer geeks. In 2008, State data disclosures led to an identity theft scheme only uncovered through a fluke arrest by the Washington D.C. cops. Before it was closed down in 2009, snooping on private passport records was a popular intramural activity at the State Department, widely known and casually accepted. In 2011, contractors using fake identities appear to have downloaded 250,000 internal medical records of State Department employees, including mine.
Wishing Isn’t a Strategy, Hope Isn’t a Plan
Despite their own shortcomings, State and its Bureau of Diplomatic Security take this position: if we shut our eyes tightly enough, there is no Wikileaks.
That all those cables were available electronically to everyone from the Secretary of State to a lowly Army private was the result of a clumsy post-9/11 decision at the highest levels of the State Department to quickly make up for information-sharing shortcomings. Trying to please an angry Bush White House, State went from sharing almost nothing to sharing almost everything overnight. They flung their whole library onto the government’s classified intranet, SIPRnet, making it available to hundreds of thousands of Federal employees worldwide. It is usually not a good idea to make classified information that broadly available when you cannot control who gets access to it outside your own organization. The intelligence agencies and the military certainly did no such thing on SIPRnet, before or after 9/11.
Despite the sometimes life-or-death nature of protecting sources (though some argue this is overstated), State simply dumped its hundreds of thousands of cables online unredacted, leaving source names there, all pink and naked in the sun.
As they raised their voices and made uncomfortable eye contact just like it says to do in any Interrogation 101 manual, you could almost imagine the hundreds of thousands of unredacted cables physically spinning through the air around us, heading—splat, splot, splat—for the web. Despite the Hollywood-style theatrics and the grim surroundings, the interrogation-style was less police state or 1984-style nightmare than a Brazil-like dark comedy.
These are not people steeped in, or particularly appreciative of, the finer points of irony.
Here’s the best advice my friends in Diplomatic Security have to offer, as far as I can tell: slam the door after the cow has left the barn, then beat your wife as punishment. She didn’t do anything wrong, but she deserved it, and don’t you feel better now?
Comments
Post a Comment