probably a pedophile: the necessity of atheism: an end to wikileaks theology

probably a pedophile: the necessity of atheism

an end to wikileaks theology
kopimist samfundet california

rebecca stout sang about child rape in the song
"probably a pedophile" about the protection by
lawmakers of widescale
child rape in the dirty deep south.
goran rudling points out the pro-pedophilia movement in sweden in the 1970's which also sought to change the law to blame the victims of rape and make rape the victim's fault.
it's a far cry from fair.
how retrogressive!
but according to assange's favorite anti-civil rights anti-women defamation websites, women are fascists for supporting equality especially for women in islam and in exploitation jobs in the euro zone pink collar work-prisons and goran rudling is attacked for his support of sexual consent laws.
rixstep calls him bipolar.
assange calls people nutty and lunatic on a whim.
because he thinks he's the new l ron hubbard or sigmund frued.
but i am anti-psychiatry.
even if i think: not guilty by reason of insanity, is his best defense: and sweden versus assange aka justice4assange is the troubling proof.
god love james ball, and that 12 million leak.
mary eng is a troll for supporting women's equality.
never mind the gitmo files, and the way war punishes men.
until all women unite to end the global war on men, and all men unite to end the global war on women, braingarbage will write.
when homophobia and shariah are promoted by monoculturally myopic misogynist wikileakistas:
bless the coptic pope.
i wonder if ketih fink will understand why marcello ferrada de noli's personal attacks against me are defamation so damaging to my spirit as to warrant assessment.
why julian assange's lawyers or the goldsmith family will allow their pet monkey julian assange to continue his vicious xenophobic attack on the women of sweden via his sweden versus assange proxies marcello ferrada de noli and ars-technica-shamed rixstep, viagra pusher rick downes, is a mystery.
why does israel shamir shame the women of sweden too??
why was yossi merman ever called an SOB?
and thank god mark stephens has the shame to deny calling the women of sweden trolls as was reported by aol.
how do marcello's cruel words ring in my ears: his disdain for immigrants to sweden for "simulating" PTSD for immigration status.
how racist and how sexist!!!!!!
the attack on "radical feminist gynecology" "fascist feminist voracity" and women who who study honor killings under shariah in sweden.

perhaps brita sundberg shouldn't have admitted to me that jennifer robinson wrote her fake swedish criminal law opinion.
and then goran rudling refused to sign the fake swedish criminal law opinion mark stephens tried to get him to sign.
this kind of legal malpractice hurts assange and the women of sweden, for starters.
now goran rudling tells me bjorn hurting and sven erik alhem were appalled. they were against this heavy diatribe against the modern women's equality movement.
as i read it in february 2011 the purported legal opinions from ragsved to gamla stan: i knew completely the opinions were written in england and reflected cultural sexist bias which could only originated from non-swedes unaware of the nascent movement to abolish economic and political second class citizenship for women globally.
just as the civil rights movement has a birthplace: so too the civil rights movement for women has a birthplace: at the murder scene of fadime sahindal: the murder scene of anna lindh.
these women, killed in sweden, managed to escape the protection of marcello's fantasy feminist conspiracy.
his sweet delusions are insidious.  easily justifiable under his age and enculturation into male-dominated business models and governments.
but that a much younger group: jennifer robinson and julian assange can have so much vision when it comes to exposing the atrocities of the american torture prisons, and so little vision towards the women victims of institutionalized sexism in sweden, leaves a few of us falling flat on our faces in disbelief.

they were appalled at the fake criminal law opinions written by british counsel, and which some swedes were encouraged to sign as if they were their own.
i noticed the fakeness of the opinion and showed up to meet brita.
i told her she should be careful.  she said she was just waiting for her cancer.
this kind of internationalized malfeasance should be noted.
i'm not above forgiving jennifer robinson or julian assange for this blame the victim mentality.
to me it is a major act of desperation: and the worst part of it is the way it expresses weakness to the international community including the state department, the wikileaks task force, and the CIA.
wikileaks is so easily threatened that it will the kick the dog.
but this time the dog is the women of sweden, and yes, even the dead women of sweden killed in honor killings and partner domestic violence and homeless women, and domestic violence survivors, rape survivors, and human trafficking survivors.
why?
michelle j anderson looks at the way women's role as legally rape-able property has evolved to a notion of a consenting autonomous individual.
the pedophiles of sweden were raping 14 year old girls before they were offed by the CIA.
women were being forcibly sterilized to make the racists happy.
this message is for joseph farrell.

the failure to assess the swedish criminal law statistics of bra.se by assange's counsel shows that they cannot and will not look at the facts of violence against women in sweden.
their blind doxical catechism: "sweden is a feminist state" does violence to the facts, and violence to the minds of potential wikileaks supporters who also value fairness to women and a world free from gender based violence and and economic violence and sexual harassment, honor killing, and gender based bigotry.
claiming that it is a financial problem: when the goldsmith/rothschild clan on surface support wikileaks: shows to me that this is a distribution problem.
the distribution of the best international scholarship towards women's equality, and un-xenophobic, un-sexist defenses for julian assange is the only dignified approach.
if all the money in the world cannot buy nobility and dignity and justice: what can?

the continued violation of the women of sweden by assange's defense website is a cruel reminder
that
@suigenerisjen ie jennifer robinson cannot get julian assange under control, and feels she must continue to promote anti-feminist websites in order to keep her dead end job with wikileaks is a sign of how internalized misogyny is used by women against other women.
pornography financed wikileaks defends the free speech of racists, yet attacks the women of sweden for studying criminal homicide of women justified by religious adherence to theocratic shariah norms of violence against women, within sweden.
why does the UK protect male-dominated parliaments and permit UK shariah councils which murder women?
where is zac goldsmith?
the violence against women by julian assange's website attacking the women of sweden is extreme.
are his lawyers
stupid or cruel, or both?


rixstep has attacked women's rights supporters in such a defamatory way. he has attacked woman #2. he has attacked julian assange's accusers for the clothes they wear and their political associations in defiance of rape shield law.
what a rape victim could expect in america, in the way from rape shield protection against the attacks on her clothing, figure, beauty, religion, or association with women's rights movements are constantly violated by wikileaks supporters who think they can help assange by attacking the women he slept with in sweden.
how british.
women are sold in sex slavery in sweden, but assange promotes a delusional fantasy horror website called sweden versus assange, or justice versus assange, in which women persecute him.
perhaps a reference to his australian custody battle?
from a purely pro-wikileaks perspective: it makes him look cowardly, mean-spirited, petty, cruel, and discriminatory.
why would a human rights organization defend shariah norms of honor killing?
why would a human rights org attack a women's domestic shelter?
or gay marriage?
or the heroic work of gudrun schyman to improve the lives of human trafficking victims in forced slavery in europe?
marcello ferrada de noel israel shamir-esque bad writing and honor killing deface the assange defense.
less would be more.
you are
known by the company you keep.
as wikileaks hurls twitter insults "nutty" "lunatic" and calls yossi melman an SOB. god love james ball and the 12 million coercion contract.  if wikileaks is a new brand of psychiatry, or scientology, there you have it, otherwise, its all not guilty by reason of insanity to me.
a 91% male dominated world government and a male dominated wikileaks who attack gender equity in sweden are not worthy my sister.
i told her, she is my muse, and if it's not good enough for her, its not good enough for me.
to some people assange is a hero
the boy who cried rape
zeke hawkins more a hero to me than julian assange


wikileaks was powerful bc of shining a light on corruption
but as they become corrupt and full of grandeur, their attack on the women of sweden will show them in the worst possible light, when the sunshine, were merely larry flynt's neon.

the continued use of misogyny to inflate the case works to assange's detriment, not benefit.

brita sundberg asked if i have been seduced by gudrun schyman  or groan rudling?
the truth is non-partisan.
that assange's defense website attacks the work of gudrun schyman's schema to fight human trafficking in sweden and europe indicates a large scale dismissiveness about women's rights.

that the EFF gets behind wikileaks economically without knowledge of this turbulent and unjustified attack on the women of sweden is another tragedy for the tech community of america.
do they know assange's lawyers allow him to constantly attack a women's domestic violence shelter in sweden as proof of the feminist conspiracy against him?
or that this defense website links to attacks on family structures other than traditional heteronormative family structures, an attack on lesbian and gay parents?
i should tell the GLBTQ community of hollywood.
is homophobia a valid human rights value?
hollywood will be aware of this, but it may be struck out of the script.
it spoils the narrative of the international subversives.

sexist UK snarls on but
Zac Goldsmith gavin macfadyen john pilger deserve better, they know better.
braingarbage knows better.
the necessity of atheism about julian assange's divinity includes a renunciation of the divine opinion of assange's legal website he heavily touts on @wikileaks twitter.
all humans are capable of great good or great evil, even beyond good and evil, when god is dead.
braingarbage denounces evil to women sold and killed under sexist legal systems.
someone was human all too human, when geoffrey robertson spoke of sucking toes in lieu of research.
the smaller minded assangists say what does violence against women in sweden have to do with assange?
so why does an honor killing, rape shield law defying, porn-cash-supporting, racist supporting homophobia supporting anti-feminist approach seem necessary?
web mags in america are all over this.
the trouble: assange appears to want to roll back equality for the young teen women of sweden.  he shows this by linking to blogs which ridicule equality measures and promote violence to women and antifeminist cyberbullies.
braingarbage arises from subjectivity, and in defiance of objectivistic pontifications.
i renounce the tyrannical puffery of marcello ferrada de noli, who insults PTSD and me personally as a troll.
the damage on my soul, he will never know.
as the assangists screech : the facts: curious it is to me, how they fail to assess facts of women's enslavement, female literacy prohibition, acid attacks, forced marriages, sex slavery.
better it were to stop promoting the fantasy that sweden is controlled by fascist feminists: as if feminism were a genocidal hate-crime.
meanwhile men kill women in sweden.
whether its men who hate women, or the girl with the dragon tattoo, or the killings in juarez, where are women safe????
they ignore sound research because it is in swedish and prefer childish  hate-based faith-based conspiracy blogs.
theocracy, down.
they attack me, because i assert a dignity-for-all approach can allow justice for all the women julian assange ever slept with as well as for assange and the tortured men tortured in gitmo or on CIA.se renditions from sweden.
attacking me, who argues win-win for wikileaks means no attacking the women of sweden, or europe.  ever. no attacking humans because of their ethnicity.
no racism.
no sexism.
period.
why doesn't kristinn hrafnsson have the courage to say this.
that would be leadership.
courage.
the courage not to be racist is what wikileaks needs.
the courage not to be sexist.
the courage not to believe sycophants.
racism against sweden, swedish men, swedish women, swedish pedophilia victims, swedish honor killing victims, or female swedish teens who do not look forward to actual equality in sweden----shows us what a failed dream wikileaks was.
amy goodman doesn't know what to say.
everybody loved the fact of collateral murder.
it opened the door to real activism, when the whole world was asleep at the wheel.
but anti-war activism, from a machine dedicated to misogyny, is not the way forward.

max schuster is a rich kid from nashville tennessee.
he stomped on my head in 2001.
headstomp company of sweden manages the music of anne brun.
her song "standing on my chest" was used to frame and defame assange as a rapist in the april 7th 2011 SVT state TV program featuring olaf palme anti-conspiracy theory theorist bodstrom's racist deportationist class borgstrom.
i pointed this out to sweden versus assange, as well as their citation of a neo-nazi.
if breivik doesn't make you want to smash your own head in, try a human rights org citing a nazi.
it makes me think expo mag might have been right all along.
long live stieg larsson.
whoever the guy was who said CIA asked him to kill olaf palme: well nevermind: because loaf palme's lot were raping 14 year old swedish girls the state failed to compensate: via the giejer affair.
and if that's what assange calls feminism: we are lost.
@suigenerisjen
state mandated hysterectomy is just another kind of state rape in the #GWOW global war on women.
in some cultures it was forbidden women to read or write or practice law.
study of shariah, and wikileaks, yields similar understanding: where harm to women is minimized or required, true justice is far away.
a bet tzedek for the victims of shariah, and wikileaks defamation campaign, will begin today.
the civil rights act of 1964 in america prohibits epithets and slurs on a racial or sexual basis.
why do assange's lawyers let him violate such an ancient principle???
rape shield law would protect victims from media attacks.
assange's lawyers and lawsters and bloggers ignore this.
perhaps they have mens rea, or perhaps not.
the net effect is horrendous: for wikileaks and all the potential supporters they alienate.
god bless america: wikileaks noblesse oblige
mary rose lenore eng
26 april 2012

Comments