Discriminatory Harassment: Federal Guidelines
Discriminatory Harassment Federal Guidelines
note to activists: if you take your work seriously, please consider fostering a workplace free from unlawful sexual or racist harassment.
after seeing numerous instances of sexist bullying online by people who claim to support wikileaks, it occurs to me that a refresher course on basic civility is in order.
while anarchists may laugh at US law: the spirit of the law is towards maximum justice.
as many of us work via internet as writers, bloggers, tweeters, researchers, journalists, and students, perhaps their is a way we can establish a bloggers union, that will attempt to find ways to protect abused demographic groups who find large degrees of sexist, homophobic, transphobic, or otherwise hateful bullying online (even within the purported human rights communities.)
open to ideas.
the unlimited free speech angle can sabotage an organization when abusive conduct by digital mobs goes completely unregulated putting anonymous perpetrators pitted against anonymous victims, who may in the end off themselves.
self-regulation may be an answer.
self-awareness.
are your terms gender biased? transhateful? enforcing racist stereotypes? sexist stereotypes?
better it were, for purported human rights groups, to enunciate clearly to their unpaid guerilla bloggers, that collectively misrepresenting the intentions of the group, causes commercial damage to the reputation of the whole.
good natured, though vicious and immature comments that hillary clinton is a "harpy" a winged woman of malicious spite, is both sexist, epithetical, and gender based discrimination that would be actionable in a work place.
comment that hillary clinton is a "harpy"
is sexist, epithetical, and gender based discrimination #wikileaks
comment that julia gillard is a "powermad robot" is sexist, epithetical, and gender based discrimination as well, #wikileaks
for the maximum integrity of the organization such permissiveness with epithet and slur should be put in control.
similarly such vicious sexism as exhibited by @flyingmonkeyair to @tomwatson should be discouraged.
@flyingmonkeyair your misogyny is showing - I'm cool with 'tweeting like a 14-year-old girl' #wikileaks #noinsult
as the fable of wikileaks
plays out . . .
the damage to the brand remains.
@tomwatson An hour since I pointed out your false assertion and you've been tweeting like a 14-year-old girl. Correct thyself, journalist.
what cruelty to women! to young women!!!! how is it possible that a grown man can tweet this way!!!!
dogmatic misogyny as creed of wikileaks supporters twitter mantras
has truly alienated braingarbage.
the thin human rights veneer chips away and there i see something more as neue sachlichkeit.
a certain corruption and wabi sabi, which has become so corrosive.
and there i wonder if wikileaks has been hijacked by the radical misogynist front.
even as we kick away the nazis.
note to activists: if you take your work seriously, please consider fostering a workplace free from unlawful sexual or racist harassment.
after seeing numerous instances of sexist bullying online by people who claim to support wikileaks, it occurs to me that a refresher course on basic civility is in order.
while anarchists may laugh at US law: the spirit of the law is towards maximum justice.
as many of us work via internet as writers, bloggers, tweeters, researchers, journalists, and students, perhaps their is a way we can establish a bloggers union, that will attempt to find ways to protect abused demographic groups who find large degrees of sexist, homophobic, transphobic, or otherwise hateful bullying online (even within the purported human rights communities.)
open to ideas.
the unlimited free speech angle can sabotage an organization when abusive conduct by digital mobs goes completely unregulated putting anonymous perpetrators pitted against anonymous victims, who may in the end off themselves.
self-regulation may be an answer.
self-awareness.
are your terms gender biased? transhateful? enforcing racist stereotypes? sexist stereotypes?
better it were, for purported human rights groups, to enunciate clearly to their unpaid guerilla bloggers, that collectively misrepresenting the intentions of the group, causes commercial damage to the reputation of the whole.
good natured, though vicious and immature comments that hillary clinton is a "harpy" a winged woman of malicious spite, is both sexist, epithetical, and gender based discrimination that would be actionable in a work place.
comment that hillary clinton is a "harpy"
is sexist, epithetical, and gender based discrimination #wikileaks
comment that julia gillard is a "powermad robot" is sexist, epithetical, and gender based discrimination as well, #wikileaks
for the maximum integrity of the organization such permissiveness with epithet and slur should be put in control.
similarly such vicious sexism as exhibited by @flyingmonkeyair to @tomwatson should be discouraged.
plays out . . .
the damage to the brand remains.
what cruelty to women! to young women!!!! how is it possible that a grown man can tweet this way!!!!
dogmatic misogyny as creed of wikileaks supporters twitter mantras
has truly alienated braingarbage.
the thin human rights veneer chips away and there i see something more as neue sachlichkeit.
a certain corruption and wabi sabi, which has become so corrosive.
and there i wonder if wikileaks has been hijacked by the radical misogynist front.
even as we kick away the nazis.
Comments
Post a Comment