who pays for domestic violence? on gudrun schyman and julian assange
Wikileaks Divestiture Ethical Disclaimer:
it is within extreme sorrow that i wish to clarify to the reader that i disapprove of many of wikileaks sexist PR agendas, and have been attempting to reform and help them evolve to a place of less hatred. my original interest in wikileaks was regarding the human rights potential and environmental law and international law progress that would come about from more information. now that wikileaks has descended to new nadirs of sexism and male domination and is now promoting swedish rape-porn j conflation joke-book: i must very clearly state i ethically cannot support this. since 2011, there many other ethical problems i approached through my blogging and published letters. i am deeply sorry if this is disturbing to people, as it is to me.
it was a great horror to hear the news, and confront the unknowable. what is known, is that the PR Machine that is @wikileaks is now a very un-progressive retrogressive anti-woman character assassination machine. wikileaks supporters attack me regularly for my honesty.
i am also saddened by the anti-islam message and the neo-nazi affiliation. extremely saddened.
author's note: for @gudschy and @suigenerisjen
please see the brilliant
http://chrchristensen.wordpress.com/2012/05/28/wikileaks-assange-feminism-base-and-superstructure/
chistensen says many things i have been trying to convey more concisely and eloquently. this is relational to the @wikileaks twitter feed which continually links to anti-feminist rants the most significant being on the official defense website.
my work towards fixing this can be seen in the letters
http://www.scribd.com/doc/90392823/Sweden-Versus-Assange-Leaks
much commotion have i made about the entire gist of the FSI case against sweden for assange as it permutated into the website swedenversusassange.
lovingly, i found it to be in error.
so much so that it bothers me when i should be sleeping.
i realized i should copy it into braingarbage, and then perhaps print it out, and cover it with red ink and mail it to everyone.
or paste a copy of a pic gudrun schyman here so people will know what a nice crusader she is against domestic violence.
 |
nobody supports domestic violence.
so who pays for it?
a friend had her teeth smashed out by a husband. who paid for that?
what does gudrun schyman have to do with julian assange?
why does he use his defense website to attack her activism for domestic violence?
there is a certain joke nobody seems to be getting.
it could be a lost in translation thing.
i adore studiototal.se
they burnt some cash up to help the protest of the wage gap IN SWEDEN.
now i love dada.
absurdism.
some people get their feelings hurt about the burnt money.
then someone prints more.
i thought it might be important to copy over the gender page of swedenversusassange so i can try to point out what's wrong about it besides the british lawyers writing the swedish ops. in defiance of swedish counsel.
besides rixstep and marcello
except it bears not repeating.
it embarrasses me: the trite redundancy of the incantation: state feminism, swedish feminism, etc.
all the nonsense of it.
how could i trust the honor killing defenders????
how does compiling crime stats on honor killing conflate into the purported swedish state feminist conspiracy against assange???
better to keep at womens rights law, rape shield law, and the feminist initiative.
i wish i could afford alcohol, or make myself drink. i'm so sober-minded.
@melbourneninja's cyberbullying hurt pretty hard the other night.
but the ninja works so hard for assange.
i think s/he makes the wikileaks scene look rude.
i found the pixel project.
the children of the night.
there is life after wikileaks.
why do i cavort with such bullies???
i'm not hanging myself in a closet like that other girl.
but the virtue is this: some info is flying around.
whether or not anyone ever accepts my help as bona fide, i get to the point of not caring.
attacking women's rights movements in sweden will not help assange.
the cliche gets triter by the day.
blacklisted said maybe assange is @melbouneninja.
we are genuinely concerned.
the smell of alcohol on the breath of KH and/or JA in supreme court.
i said: "i wouldnt get close enough to notice."
attacking feminism and women's domestic violence shelters as a defense against sex accusations doesn't translate in sweden or california.
it might make sense drunk. or dead.
@melbourneninja's cruelest tweet was:
@braingarbage Your #Assange spamming implies that women are weak/inferior & need to be shielded from criticism. This is morally repugnant!
i then copied rape shield documents from many jurisdictions into braingarbage.
the shield word is on linguistic drift.
one got 400 reads.
the chastity one from michelle j. anderson about attacking women who make complaints of violations.
so that was cool.
so if the women who made the accusations shouldn't be attacked, why should other random women and women's rights activists????
or dead islamic women like fadime sahindal?
Foto: Eva Tedesjö
it seems like gender discrimination to me.
and whether or not the faithful believe me: i don't want assange to be tortured by the US GVT. and i think cooling the anti-women extremism and anti-sweden thing will help put the machine back in a more favorable light.
stop attacking islamic women's right to life.
honor killing investigations are not a part of the feminist conspiracy against julian assange.
that's ridiculous.
i wish joseph farrell could have spared us that evil tweet.
what with the nazi on sweden versus assange.
as if rixstep wasn't discredited enough with his crudity on twitter.
what kind of idiocracy for law is this????
recommending a neonazi mass murderer for assange's defense.
he should be fired.
a jumbo jet indeed. all this hateful speech: lunatic, powermad robot, nutty, morons. kindergarten.
all i hear is pain.
wikileaks is in pain.
somebody get through. steady the ship. stop freaking out. nobody understands the idea "espionage" or "cyber."
i was getting concerned that the suicide operation of it: was really trying to go down in flames: piss as many people off as possible?
why alienate and mock women at a time like this?
why gender profile us with a section called "gender politics?"
politics has always been male dominated.
that's not even noteworthy, in england.
attacking one country that is trying to turn that around for the young women and men of the future.
well, that is unfortunate.
i would wish better for assange's daughter.
i hope jacob appelbaum has a good time in DC playing a game of FOIA.
Comments
Post a Comment