"Not only have they been sexually abused, they have also been described as the villains," he said.
Claes Borgstrom, a lawyer for the Swedish women, said the allegations have nothing to do with Mr. Assange's work. Mr. Borgstrom said such suggestions demean his clients. "Not only have they been sexually abused, they have also been described as the villains," he said.http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303410404577466451557963794.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
the misogynists of TEAM ASSANGE have been promoting a book on Porn and BDSM which lets wikileaks (assange) redefine rape according to his own terms and attack his victims character, again, more aggressively than ever before. it couldn't get nastier or stupider than this.
or could it?
i can't believe his lawyers let him paint himself into this woman-hating unsophisticated porny rapey corner.
over and over again.
why they let him violate rape shield protections, over and over, by linking to bloggers and journalists and tweeters who constantly attack the complainants.
name blame stalk humiliate verbally abuse condemn and insult women for reporting rape.
the net effect will be ultra digital misogynist mob revenge for anyone making a rape complaint.
to blatantly discourage rape reporting and attack victims makes wikileaks an "organization" unworthy our respect.
this has become extremely clear to a lot of people, suddenly.
i cannot understand why the assange defense has allowed him to continually attack women, women's rights activists, women politicians, and the rape complainants.
i have been writing letters since february 2011 about this wrongheaded attack on women's rights to equality in sweden.
for so saying, i am bullied by the rape victim-bashers online who think they can help assange by attacking women online.
i believe assange would have been better off to conduct a dignified defense which is unfair to no one, and attacks no one, and verbally abuses no one.
his citation of victim bashing and nazi recommending rixstep and his citation of feminist conspiracy blogger ferrrada de noli, make him look a fool.
a better approach would have noted justice for all, and no medieval witch trials for rape victims, no attack of women's rights activists, no bullying of women for reporting rape, and no citation on the part of wikileaks of bloggers and journalists who bully and stalk the victim.
total dignity and fairness 100% of the time.
oh were that it were so.
but instead, wikileaks demonizes rape reporting and makes the women in sweden into villains.
reprehensible is wikileaks promotion of books which trash their character and imply the victims are porn stars and thusly wanted to be raped.
rixstep bullies stalks and names and shames the victims.
yet wikileaks promotes him all the time, stalking and harassing his victims online by proxy, by digital misogynist hit-men.
the rape complainants are also victims of the wikileaks cyberbully culture of victim harassment.
the sexual harassment aspect of sex demands for staff in sweden is yet another un-assessed issue.
add to this the harassment his lawyers have allowed him to conduct in his PR War on the women.
rixstep promotes the wikileaks redefining rape book.
@exiledsurfer promotes the wikileaks redefining rape book.
so does wikileaks central.
that wikileaks would participate in bullying these women, is extremely disheartening and disturbing.
i cannot believe jennifer robinson, gareth peirce, and dinah rose allowed him to do this.
i consider it legal malpractice, if they have not done their utmost to stop his attacks on the rape complainants.
have they never heard of rape shield in england.
oh my god.
if they have done their best to control his further self-harm and self-indemnification, by villainizing and stalking the women online and other innocent women such as gudrun schyman, very well then.
why did they not resign or attempt to make a statement refuting his bullying harassment of the victims online?
geoffrey robertson and mark stephens made extreme insults in court to the women in february 2011, at which point i lost all confidence in their ability to handle this case.
also sprach zarathustra
wikileaks is dead
press summary
assange UKSC_2011_0264_ps
may 30 document from the uk supreme court
assange UKSC 2011 0264 Judgment
update june 20, 2012
see also
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/jun/20/julian-assange-asylum-tragedy-lawyer
Victim-Blaming, and Criminal Victim-stalking by Assange Defense website
comment for
stavvers.wordpress.com re: the feminist conspiracy alleged by justice4assange and @swedenvsassangeand promoted by @wikileaks
hey, the feminist conspiracy was first launched in february 2011 by law firm FSI, the conspiracy defense website launched june 2011 promoted by @wikileaks attacks the victims and other women unrelated to the case including politicians and domestic violence shelters in sweden and the human trafficking law. it also linked to a nazi murderer tony olsson’s legal opinion. this was pointed out to me by goran rudling march 2012 and it took SVA three weeks to delete the nazi. the website cites rixstep who is rick downes, a viagra spammer, who stalks the rape victims online. it also cites marcello ferrada de noli who indicates a lesbian-feminist conspiracy and attacks non-traditional marriage among swedish lesbians, as well as the study of shariah honor killing to be a part of a conspiracy against assange and of men’s right to rape and or kill partners and daughters. wikileaks linked to this blog march 22. it was clearly deranged. i have been stalked for complaining of the sexism in the defense as not in assange’s best interest, called a CIA agent and a troll.
here is correspondence pertaining to the stalking and abuse i have endured and the advocacy i have waged to get the nazi and the antifeminism off the official defense site.
thanks for pointing out how absurd the feminist conspiracy rape defense is. i believe assange’s lawyers have made a great mistake in allowing this, which may end up as civil claims against him for defamation and cyberbullying his victims.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/90392823/Sweden-Versus-Assange-Leaks
http://www.scribd.com/doc/97459227/Misogyny-Leaks-Wikileaks
http://braingarbagedystopie.blogspot.com/2012/05/who-pays-for-domestic-violence-on.html
http://braingarbagedystopie.blogspot.com/2012/04/on-bizarre-trolls-and-rape-shield-law.html
mary rose lenore eng
justice is non partisan
message for peter kemP:
ReplyDeletewhy should you trust anyone.
what is more ethically damaging, sacrificing women for the wikileaks show or personal gain,
or getting the truth out about the misogyny culture around wikileaks.
i have found many wikileaks people to be pro-censorship about their agenda. why should you have trusted me at all.
trust me to be ruthless for the truth, and ask yourself why you sought to keep this information hidden from potential donors, when their participation in wikileaks is shrouded by intentional cover-ups of the consent law failings on the part of wikileaks and the nazi on sweden versus assange and the rape redefined as "free love"
re his:
My position at WLC is now on thin ice as the admin(s) do not want me to collaborate further with Goran: please keep that confidential as I am working through my options and not necessarily lose the platform for voicing my mainly legal opinion. I believe Rick Downes is the admin that put the kybosh on me collaborating at WLC with Goran
I think Goran is an intellectually honest guy and I have great respect for him, notwithstanding we disagree on various issues. He wants to reform Sweden's laws to benefit complainants (and defendants) and I think that is commendable. In my own country there is also a lot of room for improvement of prosecution practices which disadvantage complainants - police here sometimes ruin cases by asking too many leading questions in interviews and otherwise like Sweden do not follow proper procedures.
Anyways, just thought I'd drop you a line to say I'm a WL supporter who acknowledges and respects your point of view and deplores any abuse you have endured from the misogynist elements among WL supporters.