David House Schools Us


idit dobb-weinstein: "teaching is action and thinking at once. What I try to guard against most when I teach is not speaking as if my answer were conclusive, so as to avoid (to the extent possible) any kind of dogmatic appropriation. It is understandable why students might wish to imitate their teachers, but there are different modes of imitation. I try very hard to avoid the mimetic appropriation that is immediate, passive, and occludes thinking. One other reason is that if I made clear what my views were, and my views appeared as if they were final, it would preclude the possibility of first, students challenging me and second, learning from my students. The relation between the student and teacher is, to me, a dynamic relationship . . . Teaching and learning is a movement that occurs between. In other words, we are at once both agent and patient, both teacher and learner. If we are not very careful, we can do a great deal of harm. And that, too, I have learned from my teachers, Maimonides especially.

I believe my task is to provoke students to think and to engage them in genuine dialogue and questioning. To paraphrase a rabbinic saying, 'I have learned from my teachers, and I have learned from my peers, but I have learned most from my students.' And that is a continuous process of learning."

my best teachers:
idit dobbs weinstein and david house.
i cannot speak too highly of them.

I have tried and have so far been unsuccessful at doing this; that failure is mine. I will to hope you can mentor our leaders...
Right now, it's our duty to revisit the first virtue he taught us -- courage through action -- and mentor him, as followers, into his role.
But right now, you and I and anyone who cares to read this knows that something has changed. We know Julian has forgotten who he is.
(2/2) a person who pays lip service to those ideals for political ends. Julian taught me that -- he taught us all that, by example.
Over this past year, I've learned -- through failure and will -- that a person who /lives/ their ideals is more important than (1/2)
... Then they are themselves responsible for the power politics which will engulf and devalue their culture.
If a people sacrifice their voice and autonomy in the service of rulers who despise evaluation...
As the virtue in our ruler's decisions begins to wane, they become able to maintain legitimacy only through courtiership and power politics.
If your government puts its own welfare before the welfare of its people, it must be swept away.
If your king needs to rely upon noble lies and malice to lead, you've got a weak king.
If your government needs to use falsehoods and oppression to govern, it's a hack government.
 There's a quality to the field of physics that surpasses the pettiness of Oppenheimer's bomb.
I hope you feel my condescension, Activists of the King's Court, because I'm doing it as hard as I can. :)
(The -be- part is important. You aren't what you tweet.)
Yeah. Be the trouble you want to see in the world.
Inconvenient, iconoclastic, narrative-breaking, defiant. Warring for an ideal. Willing to bring the dissonance that the public runs from...
Inconvenient activist is inconvenient. And here I thought hard-won truths were in vogue... :)

Comments