Joe Walsh exclusion injunction appeal 16 ACLU again

Saltzman fails to explain his paranoia about backpack. He had sicked a rabid pack of police and g4s on a disabled man. of course property would be lost and abandoned in the commotion.

Saltzman and company are trying to allege a bomb threat to justify their wrongful and brutal arrest and continuing pre-emptive illegal EXCLUSION (see WALSH v. Enge) and consequent detention of Barry Stull. a post facto defense obtained via ILLEGAL search and seizure of abandoned property, following an unlawful, chaotic, and needless arrest

with massive amounts of paranoia and hype thrown in, which is what this is all about