letters re: the neo-nazi murderer tony olsson on justice4assange.com, the face of david house, the good name of bradley manning, and the misogyny of team assange in defiance of international law
letters re: the neo-nazi murderer tony olsson on justice4assange.com, the face of david house, the good name of bradley manning, and the misogyny of team assange in defiance of international law
state sovereignty cannot over-rule women's basic human rights not to be raped. sorry ecuador.
is misogyny a serious issue? what about neo-nazi-ism? what about a misogynist who stalks assange's victims and recommends a neonazi--grants him a project paperclip clean up--slips it past assange? if you were julian assange would you scrap the blogger that may become a legal risk? a PR risk? a character-damaging catastrophe?
do you consider it a legal risk to link to Neo-Nazi extremists? the more i think about it, the more i dislike it. if assange were clean and smart, he would disaffiliate with rixstep, the same way he did with israel shamir, his holocaust denier friend, because neo-nazis and attacks on feminism on his rape defense site, are making us all look foolish.
now this series of letters helps to gauge the climate.
i wasn't sure at first, who made it, but a poster was released about the wikileaks grand jury in relation to david house's famous "I invoke" notes.
the poster has a side profile of david house over the name of the website "justice4assange.com" and i instantly felt creepy about it.
justice4assange.com was citing the neonazi tony olsson, until rixstep got busted.
the justice4assange.com website attacks the organization for women in sweden that helps domestic violence.
if i were david house, i wouldnt want to be associated with an anti-feminist website which promotes a neo-nazi.
i hope jennifer robinson is getting paid well for keeping mum and never mentioning all the massive international law regarding rape, war rape, and rape as a crime against human rights or CEDAW.
what a lawyer.
i think it has been unethical for her to block me on twitter because she can't defend this, or the potentially financially draining victim attacks, or the attacks on me by melbourneninja, exiledsurfer and even more deranged cyberstalkers for assange.
who will be the first wikileaks cyberbully induced suicide?
will anyone care then?????
the twitter for swedenvsassange account tries to gag me about talking about the ethical credibility problem of a nazi on assange's website.
m_cetera ioerror and suigenerisjen have all blocked me on twitter.
perhaps because they don't want to hear about rape shield law, rape victims rights, or my ethical questions about the NeoNazi on assange's rape defense website or @wikileaks promotion of the redefining rape as free love and swedish sex book and the "never censor child porn" comment.
victims attacks on the morality and the rape-ability of the victims.
attacking the victims by calling their claims a "smear."
it sounds so unclean.
attacking their blogs, their clothes, their politics.
england.
when that wikileaks uncensored child porn is made with kids i know and care about, i'm failing to see the ACLU KKK right to free speech, slash forensic entrapment angle.
it's just getting creepy.
add to this assange said something racist in a cryptome.org published email about child pornography sexual consent and race.
he said the age of sexual consent may be lower for some races. (i was so grossed out to read this and his numerous other crude comments.)
(provide link).
okay.
so then after the PGPBoard alan taylor via spartacus links about assange planting child pornography on his ex-wife's boyfriend, and calling australian police for a fake sting.
for which the whistleblowers get death threats . . . .
a restraining order on assange, and property destruction . . .
well---dont you hope its all a fairy tale?
so--
rixstep harasses the rape victims on twitter and via his poison pen blogs. he threatens lawsuits to suppress crime report translation. (agaisnt al burke) he promotes the conspiracy theory of feminist CIA agents.
he attacks goran rudling.
if i were assange i would fire rixstep. disaffiliate from bloggers who try to spike the wikileaks punch with neo-nazi-ism or misogyny.
assange is like: GIVE ME MORE MONEY.
why do his lawyers let him do this? are they paid too much or too little?
what amount of money causes lawyers to support attacking victims?
what lack of subtlety fails to get this . . . ?
i called out to kurdo baksi the deceased stieg larsson's colleague on this.
a year ago i was semi-high on the wikileaks kool aid, when i fought really hard to understand or justify why expo.se had assange on the cover.
its the swedish way of calling you the "Racist of the Month" in 2011. it was still on the gothenberg newstand july 2011.
but it seems the holocaust denier fetish, and the casual racist things in those early emails about the "jews" leads me to feel skeptical.
say then there is a neo-nazi on assange's defense website.
they promise to remove it.
it takes three weeks.
it's been there for 6 months.
none of your swedish experts have pointed out.
they are too busy drooling over you.
none, but goran rudling, whose emails were passed from mark stephens to rixstep, for a poison pen attack on goran which calls him bipolar.
i get tired of all the pop psychology. as if wikileaks has become a branch of psychiatry, and assange can call people nutty on a whim, as if he's sigmund freud, himself.
instead of firing rixstep they keep promoting him.
like a catholic priest moved to a new school.
every one acts whitewashed.
is Rixstep the XENU warrior princess of the wikileaks new scientology?
the ULtra Dogma.
or is this the MKULTRA riddle test crack?
so overprotectingly, i wrote some letters to the house team.
i am concerned bradley manning may object to the neo-nazi, the victim stalking, the misogyny, if not the transmisogyny. the attacks on the swedish women's shelters for domestic violence, or islamic shariah honor killing victims, assange has blamed via his favorite loose cannon.
for the assange-o-centric feminist conspiracy.
when i realized the posters originated with somerset bean--i thought i might venture into these unknown waters, of how seriously they take neo-nazis or misogyny.
going after the head hippie JPBarlow of EFF on misogyny in tech, is only so rewarding. he calls rape "ungentlemanly."
nothing like a sexist hippie.
except a manarchist.
the Center for Constitutional Rights won't get back with me on why Vatican rapes are crimes against humanity and Assange rapes are whitewashed.
now god love david house for getting back with me---if but to tell me he doesnt have time to investigate this branding crisis of nazis and misogynist victim stalkers appropriating his nice face.
i'm copyleft too.
kopimi.
but . . .
i appreciate somerset bean giving me her best admission about the misogyny at team assange.
like peter kemp lawyer wants to console me about the misogyny and bullying, but quietly brush it under the rug so he can keep up his prestigious? role blogging for now more misogynistic wikileaks central, which seems to also be powerhoused by goran rudling hating rixstep, who stalks the victims, threatened to sue al burke, attacks women's rights activists in sweden, and planted a neo-nazi on assange's rape defense website.
was rixstep hired to make assange look like an idiot?
what kind of message does this send to the Neo-Nazi Tony Olsson, who is probably sitting in prison intellectually delighted that his prison blog is a legal resource beloved of wikileakstas internationally.
now maybe they will get into his other messages beyond his : "sweden's justice system is so unfair" line.
he has access to a computer in swedish prison.
think about that.
in america, prisoners have access to prison rape.
so
sure second chances, third chances.
but when assange is raking in loads of cash, not paying his free interns and digital mob of victim-stalkers, money is going into a black hole called the julian assange defense fund, his defense website promotes a murderer racist, and bradley manning's name stands to get conflated with neo-nazi-ism rampant anti-rape victim's rights misogyny, it's only fair to BLOW THE WHISTLE.
on the meme formerly known as wikileaks (RIP)
i kind of wonder what mark stephens thinks. it appears the lawsuit v. assange is still on, as he is MUM.
for whatever reason---i have a lot of faith in david house's ethical potential.
i think he needs to steer bradleymanning.org away from misogyny and nazi-ism and overall pettiness and mean-ness and poor PR stuff at the church of assange.
for instance i think it's lousy for freedom of information activist @ioerror to promote @deathtolamo because i am post-death penalty. i don't think it's helpful for @ioerror @suigenerisjen and @m_cetera to block having a discussion over this kind of an ethical problem set.
blocking this discussion may be easy, but the ethical problem grows when this kind of strategy is employed.
blocking and censorship and gag requests from a group that claims a trademark on "Transparency" is sort of the ultra-irony.
if transparency is a clique that whitewashes it's "star" as sarah harrison called assange in her frontline club release of the Syria Files, and gags actual ethical and serious problems, like neonazis and victim stalking. well .....
dear white house . . . can you comment on the neo-nazi on assange's defense site?
how is this helping bradley manning?
victoria nuland and hillary clinton, can you comment on the retaliatory stalking of assange's victims as he continues to delay the processing of their claims in sweden?
state and white house, do you agree that rape is "hilarious" as per the Senile Ricardo Patino standard?
dear me.
hillary, i doubt she'd call rape hilarious.
but the homeless crisis on her american streets is also a rape crisis.
if nobody agrees with me that david house's good name shouldnt get appropriated to sell the rape-victim-morality-attacking swedish sex redefining rape as free love for julian assange book or his anti-domestic violence shelter gudrun-schyman-attacking rape defense website . . .
it's all blood under the bridge.
or is it?
it might be tomorrow's UTOYA island massacre.
i just really don't like ethical sloppiness about violent hateful ideologies.
as they lock away sweden's latest racist murderer Mang, heads up.
ror inte min kompis.
letter 1 from me:
Mary,
kind of you to reply.
i
am sure you understand it is not good to attack the women who made the
criminal reports in sweden. criminal retaliation. justice 4assange goes
beyond this to attack many innocent and good people in sweden. beyond
that . . .
Hi Mary,
I understand that you are clearly disturbed by the claims you make, and I hope you can achieve some peace of mind.
If you would like busy people to look into your claims, you need to provide direct evidence (links etc) to your claims. I am immediately sceptical just on the basis of your completely misrepresenting the Ecuadorian Foreign Ministers "hilarious" comment and using it out of it's context.
Like David I do not have the time and energy to dig for hours for justification or otherwise for your arguments. You need to provide solid evidence.
Wishing you well,
Andrew Bath (aka somersetbean)
Hi Mary,
I hope you are well.
Sorry I have limited time to look into things so this is fairly brief. However I try to keep an open mind and investigate issues of concern as much as i am capable...
Having looked a little at the Olsson issue, I believe it to be a big leap of logic to therefore imply that Julian Assange is promoting or supporting neo-nazis.
As to attacks on the 2 women in Sweden, I can see no evidence of Assange personally attacking them, personally or physically. You call them victims which implies guilt on Assange's part before even any charges have been laid. And the basis for charges seems non-existent as was the original decision of the prosecutor. From what I have studied, I do not believe this case to be about sexual crimes.
I do accept that there may be some mysogyny on the part of a few
Assange supporters - but's it's not part of his defense - it just
happens to be everywhere! I'm certainly not condoning it and nor do any
of the many people supporting Assange who I am in contact with here in
Australia.
Have you read this...XXX Interesting that many Xists are supporting Assange.
I combine what I read with my instinct as well as the contact I have with people and their opinions, to form my own views. I don't keep my views set in stone. Which is why I would never dismiss claims such as yours without investigating further. However, I think you may be getting so bogged down with these issues that you have ended up distorting their meaning and implications.
I wish you well,
Regards,
Andrew (aka @somersetbean)
state sovereignty cannot over-rule women's basic human rights not to be raped. sorry ecuador.
is misogyny a serious issue? what about neo-nazi-ism? what about a misogynist who stalks assange's victims and recommends a neonazi--grants him a project paperclip clean up--slips it past assange? if you were julian assange would you scrap the blogger that may become a legal risk? a PR risk? a character-damaging catastrophe?
do you consider it a legal risk to link to Neo-Nazi extremists? the more i think about it, the more i dislike it. if assange were clean and smart, he would disaffiliate with rixstep, the same way he did with israel shamir, his holocaust denier friend, because neo-nazis and attacks on feminism on his rape defense site, are making us all look foolish.
now this series of letters helps to gauge the climate.
i wasn't sure at first, who made it, but a poster was released about the wikileaks grand jury in relation to david house's famous "I invoke" notes.
the poster has a side profile of david house over the name of the website "justice4assange.com" and i instantly felt creepy about it.
justice4assange.com was citing the neonazi tony olsson, until rixstep got busted.
the justice4assange.com website attacks the organization for women in sweden that helps domestic violence.
if i were david house, i wouldnt want to be associated with an anti-feminist website which promotes a neo-nazi.
i hope jennifer robinson is getting paid well for keeping mum and never mentioning all the massive international law regarding rape, war rape, and rape as a crime against human rights or CEDAW.
what a lawyer.
i think it has been unethical for her to block me on twitter because she can't defend this, or the potentially financially draining victim attacks, or the attacks on me by melbourneninja, exiledsurfer and even more deranged cyberstalkers for assange.
who will be the first wikileaks cyberbully induced suicide?
will anyone care then?????
the twitter for swedenvsassange account tries to gag me about talking about the ethical credibility problem of a nazi on assange's website.
m_cetera ioerror and suigenerisjen have all blocked me on twitter.
perhaps because they don't want to hear about rape shield law, rape victims rights, or my ethical questions about the NeoNazi on assange's rape defense website or @wikileaks promotion of the redefining rape as free love and swedish sex book and the "never censor child porn" comment.
victims attacks on the morality and the rape-ability of the victims.
attacking the victims by calling their claims a "smear."
it sounds so unclean.
attacking their blogs, their clothes, their politics.
england.
when that wikileaks uncensored child porn is made with kids i know and care about, i'm failing to see the ACLU KKK right to free speech, slash forensic entrapment angle.
it's just getting creepy.
add to this assange said something racist in a cryptome.org published email about child pornography sexual consent and race.
he said the age of sexual consent may be lower for some races. (i was so grossed out to read this and his numerous other crude comments.)
(provide link).
okay.
so then after the PGPBoard alan taylor via spartacus links about assange planting child pornography on his ex-wife's boyfriend, and calling australian police for a fake sting.
for which the whistleblowers get death threats . . . .
a restraining order on assange, and property destruction . . .
well---dont you hope its all a fairy tale?
so--
rixstep harasses the rape victims on twitter and via his poison pen blogs. he threatens lawsuits to suppress crime report translation. (agaisnt al burke) he promotes the conspiracy theory of feminist CIA agents.
he attacks goran rudling.
if i were assange i would fire rixstep. disaffiliate from bloggers who try to spike the wikileaks punch with neo-nazi-ism or misogyny.
assange is like: GIVE ME MORE MONEY.
why do his lawyers let him do this? are they paid too much or too little?
what amount of money causes lawyers to support attacking victims?
what lack of subtlety fails to get this . . . ?
i called out to kurdo baksi the deceased stieg larsson's colleague on this.
a year ago i was semi-high on the wikileaks kool aid, when i fought really hard to understand or justify why expo.se had assange on the cover.
its the swedish way of calling you the "Racist of the Month" in 2011. it was still on the gothenberg newstand july 2011.
but it seems the holocaust denier fetish, and the casual racist things in those early emails about the "jews" leads me to feel skeptical.
say then there is a neo-nazi on assange's defense website.
they promise to remove it.
it takes three weeks.
it's been there for 6 months.
none of your swedish experts have pointed out.
they are too busy drooling over you.
none, but goran rudling, whose emails were passed from mark stephens to rixstep, for a poison pen attack on goran which calls him bipolar.
i get tired of all the pop psychology. as if wikileaks has become a branch of psychiatry, and assange can call people nutty on a whim, as if he's sigmund freud, himself.
instead of firing rixstep they keep promoting him.
like a catholic priest moved to a new school.
every one acts whitewashed.
is Rixstep the XENU warrior princess of the wikileaks new scientology?
the ULtra Dogma.
or is this the MKULTRA riddle test crack?
so overprotectingly, i wrote some letters to the house team.
i am concerned bradley manning may object to the neo-nazi, the victim stalking, the misogyny, if not the transmisogyny. the attacks on the swedish women's shelters for domestic violence, or islamic shariah honor killing victims, assange has blamed via his favorite loose cannon.
for the assange-o-centric feminist conspiracy.
when i realized the posters originated with somerset bean--i thought i might venture into these unknown waters, of how seriously they take neo-nazis or misogyny.
going after the head hippie JPBarlow of EFF on misogyny in tech, is only so rewarding. he calls rape "ungentlemanly."
nothing like a sexist hippie.
except a manarchist.
the Center for Constitutional Rights won't get back with me on why Vatican rapes are crimes against humanity and Assange rapes are whitewashed.
now god love david house for getting back with me---if but to tell me he doesnt have time to investigate this branding crisis of nazis and misogynist victim stalkers appropriating his nice face.
i'm copyleft too.
kopimi.
but . . .
i appreciate somerset bean giving me her best admission about the misogyny at team assange.
like peter kemp lawyer wants to console me about the misogyny and bullying, but quietly brush it under the rug so he can keep up his prestigious? role blogging for now more misogynistic wikileaks central, which seems to also be powerhoused by goran rudling hating rixstep, who stalks the victims, threatened to sue al burke, attacks women's rights activists in sweden, and planted a neo-nazi on assange's rape defense website.
was rixstep hired to make assange look like an idiot?
what kind of message does this send to the Neo-Nazi Tony Olsson, who is probably sitting in prison intellectually delighted that his prison blog is a legal resource beloved of wikileakstas internationally.
now maybe they will get into his other messages beyond his : "sweden's justice system is so unfair" line.
he has access to a computer in swedish prison.
think about that.
in america, prisoners have access to prison rape.
so
sure second chances, third chances.
but when assange is raking in loads of cash, not paying his free interns and digital mob of victim-stalkers, money is going into a black hole called the julian assange defense fund, his defense website promotes a murderer racist, and bradley manning's name stands to get conflated with neo-nazi-ism rampant anti-rape victim's rights misogyny, it's only fair to BLOW THE WHISTLE.
on the meme formerly known as wikileaks (RIP)
i kind of wonder what mark stephens thinks. it appears the lawsuit v. assange is still on, as he is MUM.
for whatever reason---i have a lot of faith in david house's ethical potential.
i think he needs to steer bradleymanning.org away from misogyny and nazi-ism and overall pettiness and mean-ness and poor PR stuff at the church of assange.
for instance i think it's lousy for freedom of information activist @ioerror to promote @deathtolamo because i am post-death penalty. i don't think it's helpful for @ioerror @suigenerisjen and @m_cetera to block having a discussion over this kind of an ethical problem set.
blocking this discussion may be easy, but the ethical problem grows when this kind of strategy is employed.
blocking and censorship and gag requests from a group that claims a trademark on "Transparency" is sort of the ultra-irony.
if transparency is a clique that whitewashes it's "star" as sarah harrison called assange in her frontline club release of the Syria Files, and gags actual ethical and serious problems, like neonazis and victim stalking. well .....
dear white house . . . can you comment on the neo-nazi on assange's defense site?
how is this helping bradley manning?
victoria nuland and hillary clinton, can you comment on the retaliatory stalking of assange's victims as he continues to delay the processing of their claims in sweden?
state and white house, do you agree that rape is "hilarious" as per the Senile Ricardo Patino standard?
dear me.
hillary, i doubt she'd call rape hilarious.
but the homeless crisis on her american streets is also a rape crisis.
if nobody agrees with me that david house's good name shouldnt get appropriated to sell the rape-victim-morality-attacking swedish sex redefining rape as free love for julian assange book or his anti-domestic violence shelter gudrun-schyman-attacking rape defense website . . .
it's all blood under the bridge.
or is it?
it might be tomorrow's UTOYA island massacre.
i just really don't like ethical sloppiness about violent hateful ideologies.
as they lock away sweden's latest racist murderer Mang, heads up.
ror inte min kompis.
letter 1 from me:
| | | ||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
I understand the importance of the issues you raise. You should
know I am overburdened and don't have the resources to educate myself on
these issues right now. I hope you understand.
It sounds like you are upset about contributors to a website which
has published information about me. Since the Internet is decentralized
and anyone can publish anything anywhere, I'm not sure why this
particular association is worth pointing out to me
directly, or to my lawyers (who receive a great volume of email daily!)
I hope you're doing well, and I'm sorry I can't offer you more
input on this issue -- I simply don't know what's going on nor do I have
the time resources to educate myself properly on this situation.
Best,
David House
letter three from me:
to David, Somerset
A neonazi on assange's defense website. for many months. justice4assange.com and swedenversusassange.com
i'm not trying to waste your time. is a neo-nazi on assange's defense website is a problem or a big problem--?
assange
promoting victim attacks and a neonazi and internal stalking and
threats i find disturbing. i think his citing a neonazi is a clear sign
something is amiss.
much of the work on getting rid of the nazi on justice4assange is here
i appreciate the decency you show to take this
seriously, as everyone else is ignoring this and the victim abuse coming
from assange's side.
i am sorry i was worried you might care--or care about the association.
when i had given up all hope---suddenly i had some
again, that you would not want to be associated with a website that
stalks the victims (via rixstep on twitter---who makes lawsuit threats
to supress the crim law translations in sweden and harasses and rape
victim-blames) or promtes a nazi murderer---or someone who does.
its a chore to read through.
it may alter your perspective or sense of trust.
blacklisting me over it has been interesting.
i would like to think people are well intentioned. if uninformed.
good work---and find what you want out of it.
i
have published these letters for months now. it should be common
knowledge that assange cited a nazi. if he gets to sweden this will
really hurt him.
there are some people who know.
his attacks on the victims, and disrespect for women's rights law will hurt him in sweden, or also the USA.
what any of us can do about it i don't know.
i just thought you might want this information.
every one else is closed down to it---or trying to gag me.
good work on forbes.
it is well and long documented but i dont want to bother you more than necessary.
of course the internet is free
a
lot of people are in pain over his cruel attitude to his victims in
sweden. i think the bradley manning network needs to distance from what
is turning into a hideous laughing stock of irrelevant misogyny. not to
mention the nazi or the nazi promoter rixstep.
neonazi cited on justice4assange.com translated by rixstep.
thanks for responding thats more than i expected.
take care
response 1 from bean:
|
Jul 16 (2 days ago)
| | ||
| ||||
I understand that you are clearly disturbed by the claims you make, and I hope you can achieve some peace of mind.
If you would like busy people to look into your claims, you need to provide direct evidence (links etc) to your claims. I am immediately sceptical just on the basis of your completely misrepresenting the Ecuadorian Foreign Ministers "hilarious" comment and using it out of it's context.
Like David I do not have the time and energy to dig for hours for justification or otherwise for your arguments. You need to provide solid evidence.
Wishing you well,
Andrew Bath (aka somersetbean)
response 2 from bean:
|
9:47 PM (17 hours ago)
| | ||
| ||||
I hope you are well.
Sorry I have limited time to look into things so this is fairly brief. However I try to keep an open mind and investigate issues of concern as much as i am capable...
Having looked a little at the Olsson issue, I believe it to be a big leap of logic to therefore imply that Julian Assange is promoting or supporting neo-nazis.
As to attacks on the 2 women in Sweden, I can see no evidence of Assange personally attacking them, personally or physically. You call them victims which implies guilt on Assange's part before even any charges have been laid. And the basis for charges seems non-existent as was the original decision of the prosecutor. From what I have studied, I do not believe this case to be about sexual crimes.
Have you read this...XXX Interesting that many Xists are supporting Assange.
I combine what I read with my instinct as well as the contact I have with people and their opinions, to form my own views. I don't keep my views set in stone. Which is why I would never dismiss claims such as yours without investigating further. However, I think you may be getting so bogged down with these issues that you have ended up distorting their meaning and implications.
I wish you well,
Regards,
Andrew (aka @somersetbean)
Comments
Post a Comment