Westwood Brutality and Prada Polanski: Rape is the new Fur
From: mary rose lenore eng
Date: Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 4:16 AM
Subject: Re: Getting info out there
To: Objectivisor McFact
thank you so much for your work
i am myself ill---and battling sexism at my school
the national tragedy impacts alot of things here statewise
nobody's work has inspired me more lately.
storysearcher is bronwyn macconville the london supporter who promoted
anti-semitic conspiracies from her psychic about assange
she was obsessed with getting westwood to do fashion on assange
westwood son was involved with occupy london.
they produced a magazine with pro-wikileaks disinfo---and other racism
and sleazy ads. it was grotesque. i dont think they are very smart.
the westwood look is about as deranged as it gets---teabag party or worse.
i am looking at it as a psychological thing---why is it that humans
support atrocitiies, genocides. what do they gain from cruelty
also i see it in waves of cool---
where the first waves of propaganda over-ruled the rights of those women.
i went from day one---into my research december 2010---both fascinated
with the foreign policy aspects of the cable gate
and completely hit by the seriousness of the rape charges.
the brainwashing to deprive the women of rights or dignity is so
rooted in sexism.
women stone other women to win in misogyny cultures.
its the only way they get respect from their cave men---to engage in
such brutality.
as i tweeted---rape is the new fur. humans are becoming barbaric
again---not merely content with conflict minerals, blood diamonds, and
cruelty to animals, and sweatshops, now they bash real living women in
sweden.
i believe some of the hatred to swedish women is out of resentment of
the unknown, the foreign, and a lot of racist sterotypes about Nordic
people---which i feel in a very personal way---as a scandinavian
american.
also--sweden is upper middle class and i believe this womenn are
receiving a special kind of scorn which is similar to a medieval witch
hunt---against their beauty, blondness, and their perceived ethnicity.
in the bashing assange world view---it is okay to hate, rape, bash
white blonde nordic women.
it is similar to the hatred that gets heaped on white men of upper
crust background. it is a safe "socially acceptable" kind of
hatred---to lash out at people from a highly civilized and
industrialized prosperous and safe country.
the misogyny is the driver.
england is revoltingly sexist to me. it was torture to stay there
from nov 2011-february 2012 bc it is very backwards in many ways,
racist, sexist, technologically behind the american west coast. there
is also this petty mean and vulgar way even journalists
interact---which i find distasteful.
i appreciate your work so much.
i will be meeting a lot of law people soon.
hacker culture+ hopefully lawrence lessig at a UCLA law conference,
and my idol keith fink, a los angeles atty of sexual harassment and
internet bullying and entertainment law. he is also really good on
anti-semitism. he is aware of my work on the tony olsson racism
angle---and for batttered women he is himself very concerned.
i do not not know if anything could be started, but i have been trying
to meet him again since may---for the assange case specifically.
the harvard paper on cyberbullying is the next wave of protecting
victims of online bullying. it is very important futuristic work for
protecting victims.
the zeitgeist is ready to move in that direction.
goran is likely mad at me for publishing all those emails---some of
which are being discussed (trashing me) on craig murray's blog.
goran rudling does not completely get the principle of rape shield law.
also brita sundberg.
sweden is actually very dissappointing on rape law development. i
believe people are afraid of the issue. there are good womens
shelters and work being done there---but we need a bigger
international perspective.
our kind of extra-judicial guerilla work is important legal work for
the trajectory of transnational legal implications of rape shield law
i have tried so much
to write rape law scholars
nicholas kristof
michelle anderson
up to my ears in school work---may have more time in a a couple of months.
there is so much more to say.
i am not scared of anything or anyone.
i can go anywhere.
i really dont polarize pro or anti anything.
i saw assange as like any criminal accused---deserving a good defense.
the messy defense is as much of a set up as anything. i even wondered
if they abandoned him to feed him to the lions.
on purpose.
i studied under a criminal defese atty in los angeles who was
extremely compassionate in defense.
i think assange should have gone with a not guilty by reason of
insanity---as its clear---but it hurts his pride.
i believe his stalking and bashing the victims of the same
pathological frame of mind---
i was also taken in as this is going to be a most fascinating study in
a "con artist"
keep up the good work---there is more---publishing everything is what
i know to do.
i believe in compassionate criminal justice systems.
if assange were effectively dealt with promptly in respect of the
crime---he would have been behind bars for a couple of years at least.
(theoretically)
even in sweden they have internet in prison---but if he engaged in
this victim bashing---they should be protected under a witness/victim
protection system, and his internet revoked or curtailed.
this is in ideal hypothetical land
this is a huge fail for english justice.
huge fail for sweden.
USA will be irritated at the impotence of the european systems.
state department is very strong on women now under clinton. DOJ too an
office on violence against women.
conversely if this is all fake. and assange is cass sunstein's
brainchild as per his 2007 wapo brave new wikiworld wikileaks press
release
obama's information czar socially engineered a huge massive world
shake up---for massive rapid regime change.
then---the positioning of women's rights is being put into the face of
us early---to get obama elected as this is the Rape-themed
election---with all the Republicans coming out pro-rape and talking on
rape and abortion.
if this were all socially engineered, the case could be useful for
moving global transnational changes for women and the entire planet.
that is the only vibe i got from assange.
i think that's why he liked me. is he could see i see through everything.
this may always remain unknown. if so, that will be "best."
check out claes borgstrom on olaf palme assassination. he and thomas
bodstrom are inner inner.
i thinkJA needs to stop flipping or pretending to flip out about the US GVT.
can't tell if its fake, or real.
i think jen rob may be in on it too.
its all disconnected handshakes.
she is is very unevolved in terms of women's rights.
they have made some silly mistakes to send me so much.
goran needed to come clean.
he is essentially complicitous with the FSI cover-up---even though he
has his own schedule for justice an revelation.
i hope he's ok, and i care about him.
i do actually worry about people's safety.
the neo-nazi ties are twisted. if this is the real viewpoint---and
not a media blitz to draw attention to the breivik social crisis of
racism in sweden---the entire info freedom mvmt is getting op-ed.
in some ways i think of jacob appelbaum and david house as extremely
ethically vacant as they will not denounce the victim attacks or the
neo-nazi links and the fria tider traffic.
assange may just be a nazi, rapist in hiding, even with his big ideas
about USGVT.
yr doing a good job.
today i think yr FBI.
if not yr hired!
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Objectivisor McFact
> Hi Mary,
>
> I am not terribly well, which is a blow; lots to do! The support of
> Westwood may work in our favour, though: it's going to get huge
> exposure. The untrue myths are already widespread, so her support
> probably won't spread them much further - but we may be able to take
> advantage. If a single major fashion magazine picks up the story, it
> could get big attention. If you have time, can you spread this link
> around?
> http://www.wikiwatch.org.uk/vivianne-westwood/
>
> If I were fully well, I'd be hitting the major magazine sites, finding
> contact emails, then sending off a form letter. I'd keep it *very*
> short - they get many emails and journalists generally want something
> quick and attention grabbing and then just a link to the data.
>
> So I'd probably go with:
> "Hi,
>
> I see Vivianne Westwood has launched her t-shirt to support Julian
> Assange. An odd cause to support - the abuse of the two women in
> Sweden by Wikileaks is well documented, and there's no reason for
> Assange to avoid facing the sexual allegations (including rape). And
> this was all pointed out to the Westwood's company some time ago - and
> they acknowledged receipt of the information. I wonder why they went
> ahead? The actual emails are up here, so you can see the info they
> were given (and the primary sources are all clickable for
> verification):
> http://www.wikiwatch.org.uk/vivianne-westwood/
>
> Very puzzling, but worth looking at - a bit of a scandal in my opinion."
>
> If any journalists click through and then follow up, the aim would be
> one of two things:
> 1) They call Westwood, put the details to her, she has a sudden change
> of heart (that's an even bigger fashion story which would go out
> through all the major channels)
> 2) They report it in their magazine - still a big story, and may still
> have the effect of (1)
>
> Probably nobody would pick it up, but it would be worth a shot. If
> you have some time and energy to spare and fancy lending a hand, that
> would be fantastic.
>
> Cheers,
>
> O
Comments
Post a Comment